Solution #1633
Solution #1633
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your code meets the task requirements and constraints effectively! 🎉 While there are some areas for improvement, such as handling potential name conflicts and ensuring the validity of names when setting wife and husband attributes, these do not critically impact the functionality. Keep up the great work, and consider these suggestions for future enhancements to make your code even more robust! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| @@ -1,8 +1,31 @@ | |||
| class Person: | |||
| # write your code here | |||
| pass | |||
| people = {} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The people dictionary is used to store instances of Person by name. This approach assumes that all names are unique, which might not be the case. Consider handling potential name conflicts or using a different identifier.
| if "wife" in one and one["wife"]: | ||
| person.wife = Person.people.get(one["wife"]) | ||
| elif "husband" in one and one["husband"]: | ||
| person.husband = Person.people.get(one["husband"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for setting wife and husband attributes assumes that the provided names are always valid and present in the Person.people dictionary. Consider adding error handling or validation to ensure that the names exist in the dictionary before accessing them.
No description provided.